Sunday, July 14, 2013

Sources for the literature review for the entire research project

References                  Return to Article
Andres, L., & Adamuti-Trache, M. (2008). Life-course transitions, social class, and gender: a 15-year perspective of the lived lives of Canadian young adults. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(2), 115-145. doi:10.1080/13676260701800753
Claybaugh, J. D., & Dahl, A. B. (2001). Increasing participation in lessonsEnsign,
David, M. E. (2009). Diversity, gender and widening participation in global higher education: a feminist perspective. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/09620210903057590
Haavind, S. (2007). An interpretative model of key heuristics that promote collaborative dialogue among online learners [1]. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3), 39-68. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Heath, S., Fuller, A., & Paton, K. (2008). Network-based ambivalence and educational decision-making: a case study of 'non-participation' in higher education. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 219-229. doi:10.1080/02671520802048760
Johnson, R. A. (2010) The effective teacher. Unpublished Paper.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A
comprehensive guide(3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(n.d). Corporate America Faces a Brain Drain. Science Letter, 3832. Retrieved from Gale:
Academic OneFile (PowerSearch) database.
Neider, M. A. (2008). Revealed quorum principles. Ensign
Subban, P., & Sharma, U. (2005). Understanding Educator Attitudes Toward the Implementation
of Inclusive Education. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(2), N.PAG. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, (2009). Gospel principles . Salt Lake City, Utah: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Top├žu, A. (2006). Gender difference in an online asynchronous discussion performance.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 44-51. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.